<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Current Quality Blog &#187; Continuous Improvement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://currentquality.com/blog/tag/continuous-improvement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://currentquality.com/blog</link>
	<description>Advancing Your Quality Assurance Knowledge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 12:04:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are Your Resources Limited?</title>
		<link>http://currentquality.com/blog/are-your-resources-limited/</link>
		<comments>http://currentquality.com/blog/are-your-resources-limited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Gauvin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quality Assurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Continuous Improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Continuous Quality Improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Do More With Less]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process Map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currentquality.com/blog/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to do more with less resources&#8230;.
It seems like every industry is being hit hard right now, with layoffs in the headlines almost daily.  Whether you&#8217;re experiencing layoffs or just a general tightening of the belt, you need to figure out a way to do more with less resources.
An easy way to do this, is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong>How to do more with less resources&#8230;.<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">It seems like every industry is being hit hard right now, with layoffs in the headlines almost daily.  Whether you&#8217;re experiencing layoffs or just a general tightening of the belt, you need to figure out a way to do more with less resources.</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">An easy way to do this, is to really look at the processes that you manage and see if there are any unnecessary or redundant steps that you can eliminate from a process&#8230;.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Create A Process Map</strong> <span style="font-weight: normal;">- Start out with a high-level process map (4-6 process steps), then work towards a mid-level one that shows you more details&#8230;.this is where you start seeing opportunities to lean out your process.  Just make sure that you capture the actual process and not the perceived process&#8230;.it&#8217;s very common for there to be a disconnect between the actual process and what&#8217;s documented in a procedure.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong>Challenge The Necessity Of Each Process Step</strong></span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> &#8211;  Each step should have a purpose behind it (regulatory requirement, etc.)&#8230;.don&#8217;t be afraid to ask &#8216;why&#8217; a step is included in the process if it doesn&#8217;t make sense or there&#8217;s no apparent purpose or justification for it. Be on the lookout for responses such as &#8220;we&#8217;ve always done it this way&#8221;.    </span></li>
<li><strong>Update Documents</strong> - If any changes are made to your process, update your documentation to reflect the changes (Standard Operating Procedure, Work Instructions, etc.).    <br />
 </li>
</ol>
<p>Take care,<br />
Sandra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://currentquality.com/blog/are-your-resources-limited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leading A Root Cause Analysis</title>
		<link>http://currentquality.com/blog/leading-a-root-cause-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://currentquality.com/blog/leading-a-root-cause-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Gauvin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quality Assurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Root Cause Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Continuous Improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operational Excellence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process Map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process Mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Root Cause]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currentquality.com/blog/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
When leading a root cause analysis, you want to make sure that you consider everything that may have contributed to the problem, otherwise you may find yourself dealing with the same problem more than once&#8230;.you&#8217;ll feel like you&#8217;re in the movie Groundhog Day.
The easiest way to lead a root cause analysis is to identify what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div>
<p>When leading a root cause analysis, you want to make sure that you consider everything that may have contributed to the problem, otherwise you may find yourself dealing with the same problem more than once&#8230;.you&#8217;ll feel like you&#8217;re in the movie Groundhog Day.</p>
<p>The easiest way to lead a root cause analysis is to identify what process the problem occurred in, then create a high-level process map that consists of approximately 4-6 process steps.  For each process step, you need to write down the inputs (Manpower, Method, Machine, Material, Mother Nature&#8230;.known as the 5 M&#8217;s).</p>
<p>Then gather a few people that are knowledgeable on the process and let them know that you would like them to participate in a root cause analysis.  Review with them each input to determine if it may have contributed in any way to the problem.   This can be done quickly if you create a numerical rating system (i.e. 0 = Didn&#8217;t contribute, 3 = May have contributed, 5 = Definitely Contributed).  Then quickly go through each input and get a rating from the participants&#8230;.document the average rating for each input and rank them in order from highest to lowest.  The input(s) that get the highest ratings should be addressed immediately.</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;ve implemented your solutions, you should monitor the process for a reasonable amount of time to make sure that you truly got to root cause&#8230;.meaning the problem shouldn&#8217;t have occurred again during that time period.</p>
<p>Always make sure that you document your root cause analysis for two reasons:  You can verify to an auditor that a root cause analysis was completed, and if you find that the problem still exists you can revisit your work and look at the next likely root cause without having to start from the beginning.</p>
<p>Let me know if you&#8217;ve found this article helpful&#8230;.I&#8217;d really like to know.</p>
<p>Take care,<br />
Sandra</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://currentquality.com/blog/leading-a-root-cause-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

